Monday, August 29, 2011

Assignment- 1 of Accounting Mgt.

6. Without Chinese economic reform, global recovery may be doomed. China needs to boost domestic consumption rather than relying on exports or the world will be flooded with goods that nobody wants! Comment ?

1. Introduction:

China has had a spectacular economic development and has come to play an increasingly important role in the world economy. For a long time, the Chinese economy was a centrally-planned economy in which all companies were owned by the state. In 1978 China started an economic reform. by reformists within the Communist Party of China (CPC) led by Deng Xiaoping.

China had one of the world's largest and most advanced economies prior to the nineteenth century, while its wealth remained average in global terms.

Economic reforms of a capitalist type began in 1978 and occurred in two stages:

- The first stage, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, involved the decollectivization of agriculture, the opening up of the country to foreign investment, and permission for entrepreneurs to start up businesses. However, most industry remained state-owned.

- The second stage of reform, in the late 1980s and 1990s, involved the privatization and contracting out of much state-owned industry and the lifting of price controls, protectionist policies, and regulations, although state monopolies in sectors such as banking and petroleum remained.

2. Discussion:

The current (2011) success of China's economic policies and the manner of their implementation has resulted in immense changes in Chinese society. Poverty was reduced and both wealth and wealth inequality increased, leading to a backlash led by the Maoist New Left. In the academic scene, scholars have debated the reason for the success of the Chinese 'dual track' economy, and have compared them to attempts to reform socialism in the Eastern Bloc and the Soviet Union, and the growth of other developing economies.

For 2010, China was ranked 140th among 179 countries in Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings, which is an improvement from the preceding year.

Impact on world growth:

China is widely seen as an engine of world and regional growth.Surges in Chinese demand account for 50, 44 and 66 percent of export growth of Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan respectively, and China's trade deficit with the rest of East Asia helped to revive the economies of Japan and Southeast Asia. Asian leaders view China's economic growth as an "engine of growth for all Asia"

Reasons for success of China:

Scholars have proposed a number of theories to explain the success of China's economic reforms in its move from a planned economy to a socialist market economy despite unfavorable factors. China's success is also due to the export-led growth strategy used successfully by the Four Asian Tigers beginning with Japan in the 1960s - 1970s and other Newly industrialized counties.

Problems faced by The Chinese Economy :

The economic reforms have increased inequality dramatically within China. Despite rapid economic growth which has virtually eliminated poverty in urban China and reduced it greatly in rural regions and the fact that living standards for everyone in China have drastically increased in comparison to the pre-reform era.

At last I want to talk about is the problems that appeared in the Chinese economy during the transition to a market-oriented economic system. China’s economic model to some extent was a surplus plus shortage economy, instead of shortage economy, throughout the central plan era. So, the Chinese economic system is facing a structural issue.

Environmental Issues:

On the other hand, China has environment concerns. We’d like to shift China’s current energy mix from a heavy reliance on coal, which accounts for 75% of China’s energy, towards greater reliance on oil, renewable energy and nuclear power. Since 1993 China has been a net importer of oil. Today, imported oil accounts for 20% of the processed crude in China. Net imports are expected to rise to 3.5 billion barrels per day by 2010. A harmful byproduct of China’s rapid industrial development has been increased pollution. Almost all our nation’s rivers are polluted to some degree, and half of the population lacks

access to clean water. Fortunately, in recent years China has strengthened its environmental legislation and made some progress in stopping environmental deterioration.

Exchange Rates:

The exchange rate is not only an internal issue but also an international one. Regarding this issue, we need to resolve two problems: Whether we need to adjust the fluctuating Yuan or just revalue the RMB. From my point of view, the government probably will do it in two steps. In one word, a stable and flexible exchange rate system is essential for the economy. It is the need for sovereignty. But also for the regional and worldwide economy. To some extent, China achieved high economic growth at a cost of income distribution. According to the World Bank, the Gini coefficient of China was 0.403, which is slightly above the internationally-recognized danger level. Some relevant measures have been taken by the new governments, such as abolishing agricultural tax to improve farmers’ income which has helped narrow the gap between rich and poor, who are then ones who pay. This is essential for a stable system.

There are still a lot of obstacles that need to be overcome on the way to a full Chinese reform. China is not only the market of Chinese but also of the world. We believe the problems that exist in the economy will finally be resolved.

• Opportunities:

– China (and other emerging market countries) are providing an important boost to global demand and output

– Export opportunities for countries producing minerals and capital goods

• Threats:

– Risks of an unsustainable boom in China leading to inflation

– Strong Chinese growth is raising commodity prices ‐ China’s purchase of commodities has a direct link into the inflation outlook globally

– Risks of a protectionist backlash – more trade disputes and debates over China’s currency manipulation.

3. Conclusion:

Lastly it is concluded that even after the various achievements like- China emerged as the world’s largest merchandise exporter in 2010, accounting for 10.1% of global exports. China also became the world’s largest economy in 2010 on a nominal dollar basis. But still, there are many problems faced by the Chinese Economy that can be the hurdle for its economic growth & standard of living of the people over there. The strength of China is its cheap technology which results in the production of goods at the lowest cost possible through their technology which is further exported in other countries at the lowest rates which greatly affects the domestic producers of a particular country. And no country wants to have a flood of goods in their domestic market and that is also imported from the China, which have cheap technology but the quality is not so good. So, the China needs to concentrate on their domestic consumption rather than relying on exports because the achievements are not for the long term as the Market changes is not stable, it keep on changing with the changing needs, habits, demography, income, taste & preferences of the people, etc and to survive & maintain the particular position in this kind of changing environment of market is very difficult.

SOURCE:

www.wikipedia.com

www.Google.com

Submitted by:

HARPREET KAUR

MBA 1 (c)

Navdeep kaur,section-C,Question no-18, Question-Foreign Aid For Development Assistance.

FOREIGN AID FOR DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE

Foreign aid- is an economic, technical or military aid given by one nation to another for purpose of relief and rehabilitation, for economic stabilization, or for mutual defense.

Foreign aid plays a vital role in improving the lives of poor households across the developing world. However, its use is to poverty reduction and development for increasing debate. It’s prompted by downward pressure on donor country aid. There should be having Greater confidence in aid effectiveness so that it increases the flow of funds from rich to poor countries. Foreign aid or (development assistance) is often regarded as being too much, or wasted on corrupt recipient governments despite any good intentions from donor countries. In reality, both the quantity and quality of aid have been poor and donor nations have not been held to account. In 1970, the world’s rich countries agreed to give 0.7% of their GNI (Gross National Income) as official international development aid, annually. Since that time, despite billions given each year, rich nations have rarely met their actual promised targets. For example, the US is often the largest donor in dollar terms, but ranks amongst the lowest in terms of meeting the stated 0.7% target.

To understand the meaning of foreign aid for development assistance there is a need to understand the meaning of three terms

1. aid

2. Foreign assistance

3. Development

Aid

Aid to provide support for or relief to. Aid received, per capita, in 2007, in $ of Official Development Assistance per person. In international relations, aid is a voluntary transfer of resources from one country to another. It can be diplomatic approval, or to strengthen a military ally. Aid provide infrastructure to donor for resource extraction. If we set a definition of principles, it remains difficult to determine the effective flow of aid because aid is fungible. Official organizations and scholars used measure of aid, "Official Development Assistance" (ODA). It is compiled by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The United Nations and the World Bank and many scholars use the DAC's ODA figure because it is easily available and calculated over time. The DAC consists of 22 of the wealthiest Western industrialized countries plus the EU. It is a forum in which they made their aid policies.

Types of aid

1International aid

2Overseas aid

3Foreign aid

Some more aid is there:-

Humanitarian aid-Humanitarian aid or emergency aid is given to people in immediate distress by individuals, organizations, or governments to relieve suffering, during and after emergencies (like wars) and natural disasters.

Lists the following principles of humanitarian action:

Ø The right to live with dignity.

Ø The distinction between combatant and non-combatants.

Development aid- Development aid is aid given by developed countries to support development in general which can be economic development or social development. It is differ from humanitarian aid. Development aid for long term and humanitarian aid for short term

Official Development Assistance (ODA), is a commonly used measure of developmental aid. Development aid is given by governments. Aid is given for a specific purpose e.g. building materials for a new school.

Programmed aid- Aid is given for a specific sector e.g. funding of the education sector of a country.

Budget support- A form of Programmer Aid that is directly channeled into the financial system of the recipient country

Sector-wide Approaches (SWAPs)- A combination of Project aid and Programmer aid/Budget Support e.g. support for the education sector.

Food aid- Food is given to countries in urgent need of food supplies. Food aid can be provided by importing food from the donor, buying food locally, or providing cash.

Untied Aid= the country receiving the aid, can spend the money as they choose.

Tied aid=the aid used to purchase products from the country that donated it or a specified group of countries

But aid could be beneficial

a) Trade and Aid

b) Improving Economic Infrastructure

c) Use aid to Empower, not to Prescribe

d) Rich donor countries and aid bureaucracies are not accountable

Development

Development means change. Development is a process of economic and social transformation within a country--both economic growth and economic development as well as improvements in human welfare. In this we can includes a concept of equity (the income level of the median household increases along with economic growth) and can include sustainability. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) also uses a broad definition of development. In this study, development encompasses a long-term trend of growth in GNP per capita, rising education levels, improving health conditions, low to moderate population growth, sustainable use of natural resources and the environment, and secure access to adequate amounts of food.

Foreign Assistance

A common means of defining and measuring foreign aid is official development assistance, which is used by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Official development assistance consists of grants or loans that one government or multilateral organization gives to a developing country to promote economic development and welfare. The OECD also uses a broader concept called official development finance, which combines official development assistance with other official flows--that is, the financial flows from government organizations in developed countries and multilateral organizations to developing countries. Foreign assistance includes money, military assistance, political development programs, and

Export Promotion, debt forgiveness, and no concessional lending by all bilateral and multilateral organizations.

We have discuses about the foreign aid and its terms. Foreign aid has merits as well as demerits. Sometime it can be effective and cannot be effective.

Aid Has Often Been Effective

Foreign assistance has often been effective to achieve its goals. Foreign aid helped eradicate polio, greatly reduce the incidence of small pox, increase life expectancy, and reduce fertility rates around the world.

· The United States Should Provide Humanitarian Assistance- Humanitarian assistance or emergency aid is given to people in immediate distress by individuals, organizations, or governments to relieve suffering, during and after emergencies (like wars) and natural disasters

· Development in Other Countries Enhances U.S. Security-

A potential threat facing the United States after the Cold War may be the spread of weapons of mass destruction, especially if combined with political instability. An internal conflict in a developing country that became a regional conflict would have dire consequences for U.S. allies if it involved use of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons--not to mention the potential impact on the regional and global environment. In 1994, "a brief survey of the world's trouble spots showed a fairly striking correlation between economic malaises on the one hand and domestic unrest and political instability on the other. If the United States can address those problems by using its foreign aid to help to create economic opportunities and invest in human capital, then the chance of conflict may be reduced.

· Foreign Aid Helps Provide Public Goods in Developing Countries-

Many developing countries do not have sufficient funds to provide public goods such as education or transportation systems or clean water and waste disposal facilities. Although such goods are essential for development, their economic rate of return is so uncertain that private investors are unwilling to provide them on a large scale. Foreign aid can substitute for private capital in those instances, providing the funds for investment in public goods that the international capital market will not supply to those developing countries or would supply at a high interest rate.

Why Do Others Criticize Aid Programs?

Critics of foreign aid use a variety of political, strategic, and economic rationales to make their case.

· Aid Is Often Ineffective

One argument is that foreign aid does not contribute significantly to economic progress in developing countries. Aid enables to divert money to other, nonproductive activities. Aid is wasted in countries that do not have the technical or administrative ability to absorb and use it properly..

· Aid Often Harms Developing Countries

Aid has serious in the political life of recipient countries. Aid is generally transferred to the government of those countries, which tends to increase the government's power, resources. People will spend their time focused on the outcome of political and administrative decisions, thereby diverting attention, energy, and resources from more productive economic activities. That may encourage tension and disturbances

· Economic Growth in Developing Countries May Not Be Beneficial for the United States

Economic growth among developing countries means that they have become competitors in the global market. Cheaper wages in developing countries allow foreign competitors to charge prices that are lower than those for comparable U.S. goods in world and domestic markets, critics would claim, thus causing the United States to lose jobs.

· Aid Should Support Only U.S. National Interests

Another argument is that the United States should target its foreign aid dollars toward countries and policies that directly support U.S. national interests. Helping all the poor people of the world, though laudable, is impractical. The United States should, therefore, enable countries to defend themselves, reward its friends, and reinforce success where it is occurring. When viewed in that light, helping the poorest of the poor may be an ineffective use of U.S. aid dollars.

My own views on this topic

Foreign aid- is an economic, technical or military aid given by one nation to another for purpose of relief and rehabilitation, for economic stabilization, or for mutual defense. Foreign aid is used to improving the lives of poor households. Foreign aid is used to reduce the poverty and development for increasing debate. It increases the flow of funds from one nation to another. By describing the policies and interactions of foreign aid donors and recipients that influence economic growth and improve human welfare in developing countries, this study specifies some catalysts of development and potential causes of underdevelopment There are numerous forms of aid, from humanitarian emergency assistance, to food aid, military assistance etc. Development aid has long been recognized as crucial to help poor developing nations grow out of poverty rich to poor countries. n 1970, the world’s rich countries agreed to give 0.7% of their GNI (Gross National Income) as official international development aid. But foreign aid has often come with a price of its own for the developing nations:

Aid is often wasted on conditions that the recipient must use overpriced goods and services from donor countries

Most aid does not actually go to the poorest that would need it the most

At the end foreign aid is used to reduce the poverty. Foreign aid is official development assistance, which is used by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

REFERANCES

WWW.WIKIPEDIA.COM

WWW.GOOGLE.COM

SUBMITED TO

PROF. GURDEEPAK SINGH

SUBMITTED BY

NAVDEEP KAUK

CLASS MBA

SEMESTER 1st

SUBJECT ACCOUNTING FOR FINNACIAL MANAGEMENT

OUESTION NO= 18

,.

.

ASSSIGNMENT OF AFM

. Where does the money When stock prices go down go ?

INTORODUCTION :

A stock market or equity market is a public entity (a loose network of economic transactions, not a physical facility or discrete entity) for the trading of company stock (shares) and derivatives at an agreed price; these are securities listed on a stock exchange as well as those only traded privately.

The size of the world stock market was estimated at about $36.6 trillion at the start of October 2008.[1] The total world derivatives market has been estimated at about $791 trillion face or nominal value,[2] 11 times the size of the entire world economy.

When stock prices go down.where does the money go :

I bought shares of AOL at $80, but the shares are now worth $15. In whose pocket did my loss of the $65 go?

This leads me to believe that even in a super-down market, somebody is making a lot of money.

We’ll use four different entities: one company, AOL, and three people named Mert, Becky, and Rachel. AOL has a share in the company that they are willing to sell, and each of our entities have the following amount of money in the bank:

Initial Positions

  • AOL has $0 (but owns 1 share)
  • Mert has $200
  • Rachel has $500
  • Becky has $1000

Suppose that the following events take place:

Share Sales

1. AOL has an IPO (initial public offering), and sells one share of stock to Mert for $30.

2. AOL’s stock goes up, and Mert sells his share to Rachel for $80.

3. The bubble bursts, AOL’s stock value crashes, and Rachel sells her share to Becky for $15

If we take each transaction one at a time, we can follow where the money goes. We’ll compare each person’s current wealth to the wealth they had when they started. First AOL goes public and sells a share to Mert for $30.


Transaction 1: AOL sells one share to Mert for $30

  • AOL has $30 (down 1 share, up $30 from initial)
  • Mert has $170 (up 1 share, down $30 from initial)
  • Rachel has $500
  • Becky has $1000

A tech boom occurs and Mert worries it may not last and he sells his share to Rachel for $80.

Transaction 2: Mert sells his share to Rachel for $80

  • AOL has $30 (down 1 share, up $30 from initial)
  • Mert has $250 (up $50 from initial)
  • Rachel has $420 (up 1 share, down $80 from initial)
  • Becky has $1000

Mert was right and the tech bubble burst. Rachel is worried that AOL may go bankrupt, so she decides to sell her share to Becky for $15.

Final Transaction: Rachel sells her share to Becky for $15

  • AOL has $30 (down 1 share, up $30 from initial)
  • Mert has $250 (up $50 from initial)
  • Rachel has $435 (down $65 from initial)
  • Becky has $985 (up 1 share, down $15 from initial)

If we’ve done our calculations correctly, the total money lost has to equal the total money gained and the total number of stocks lost has to equal the total number of stocks gained. Mert ($50) and AOL ($30) are collectively up $80, and Rachel ($65) and Becky ($15) are collectively down $80, so no money has entered or left the system. Similarly AOL’s one stock loss is equal to Becky’s one stock gained.

Suppose the true “value” of the share is $15. Then we can figure out each entities net value by adding $15 per share to anyone who has a share, and subtract $15 per share to anyone who is down a share.


Net Value of the Four Entities

  • AOL has a net value of $15 (up $15 from initial)
  • Mert has a net value $250 (up $50 from initial)
  • Rachel has a net value $435 (down $65 from initial)
  • Becky has a net value $1000 (even)

It has become quite clear where Rachel’s lost $65 has gone: Mert has $50 of it, and AOL has $15 of it. If we change the value of the stock, the total net amount AOL and Becky are up will be equal to $15, so for every dollar the stock goes up, Becky will have a net gain of $1 and AOL will have a net loss of $1. So no money will enter or leave the system when the price changes.

Note that in this situation nobody put more money in the bank from the down market. Mert was the big winner, but he made all his money before the market crashed. After he sold the stock to Rachel, he’d have the same amount of money if the stock went to $15 or if it went to $150.

It is true that AOL’s net value does go up when the stock price goes down, because when the price of the stock plunges, it becomes cheaper for AOL to repurchase the share they sold to Mert. If the stock price goes to $10 and they repurchase the share from Becky, they will be up $20 as they initially sold the share for $30. However, if the stock price goes to $70 and they repurchase the share, they will be down $40. Note that unless they actually make this transaction AOL does not gain or lose any cash from changes in the share price. I've assumed that they do not repurchase the share, so AOL has not gained money from the lower stock price.

Lastly consider Rachel's situation. If Becky decides to sell her share to AOL, from Rachel’s perspective it doesn’t matter what price Becky charges AOL as Rachel will still be down $65 no matter what the price. But unless AOL actually makes this transaction, they're up $30 and down one share, no matter what the market price of that share is.

By constructing an example, we can see where the money went, and see that the guy making all the money made it just before the crash happened.


SUBMITTED TO:

MR. GURDEEPAK SINGH

SOURCE:

GOOGLE

SUBMITTED BY:

AJAYPAL SINGH